The Hillsdale Collegian
  Volume 127, Number 24                            April 29, 2004
Sections


Home
Features
News
Opinions
Arts
Lifestyles
Sports

 

Archives

View Archive

Contact Subscription Manager

Advertisers

Rate Card

Ad Contract

Contact Advertising Manager

Editors

Colleen McGinness
Co-Editor-in-Chief
News Editor

John Davidson
Co-Editor-in-Chief
Opinions Editor

Joy Ulrickson
Sports Editor

Elliot Wild
Arts Editor

Katie Truesdell
Asst. News Editor

Daniel Greene
Web Editor

Opinions

Hillsdale's illiberal arts


It happens like this every year. Another class has completed the task, and will now, ready or not, make their great leap forward. Once again, the senior graduates are a mixed bag of both great and small personalities and intellects. But one thing they all now share: To the degree that they believe in the ideals espoused here, they have become aliens, and an oddity in the dominant culture.

How will most Hillsdale students engage "the city" as it is today?

Some will go forth draped in a proud flag; some will walk toward their culture with a large cross held up before them; some are bursting to exclaim to the world all the things they believe it needs to hear from them. Others are already scrambling for some tiny niche to hide in.

There is an assumption that the Hillsdale College education has prepared the student to meet the challenges life will present. At this school it is a doubly powerful assumption, because Hillsdale, in nomine patris, has embraced a role far beyond its proper bounds as a liberal arts institution. It is the heart of the liberal education to let ideas influence moral behavior; it is quite a different sort of education that enforces moral behavior with religious law.

When it comes to training up the intellect, this college excels and must rightly be honored for its undisputed greatness. But when it comes to its theologically guided moral imperatives that seek to control the private lives of young adults, this college is an undoubted failure. It is a failure because these are two principles and goals in direct opposition to each other.

At Hillsdale College, the student learns all about self-government, but is denied the practice of it in any meaningful way.

In a sense, this monstrous parent has worked diligently to cover the eyes and ears of its students against immorality-such as unchastity for instance. It has assumed the student to be still a child who is not yet ready to make fundamental behavioral choices and meet temptations as they actually exist today. It has tucked young adults in and locked their doors for them, monitored their halls and bedrooms; it looks through peepholes, diaries and drawers for evidence of "sin;" it runs to parents; it denies the right to protest; it encourages the disgrace of student-informants; it seems vested more in appearance than reality; in almost no way does it encourage independent action or personal responsibility.

In this way, Hillsdale College has done far more harm than service to its students, and created an environment more like that of a Christian Bible camp than a viable arena of ideas. For many, it has, in effect, retarded the personal growth and maturity that could and should have been practiced and thus strengthened during this essential time.

And what is the result of an institutional attempt to educate the mind for freedom, but the body and spirit for child-like obedience? A few examples come to mind.

Recently, sophomore Ivan Heitmann wrote an embarrassing public letter that said, "Guess what: Hillsdale College is almost synonymous with 'moral agenda.' Deal with it. If that's intolerable, leave. Otherwise, shut up." The shocking illiberality of this statement is more than simply an isolated example of a sophomoric mind; it is more than pure Christian anti-intellectualism; it is an example of the kind of schizophrenia that comes when the liberal arts clash with religious dogmatism in a burgeoning mind.

And in some cases, this retardation translates in unfortunate ways to an idealistic fantast that makes the young intellect into a tool of irrelevance. There is hardly a better example than the recent honors thesis that argued for an exchange of women's suffrage for a return to the male-centered household. This is not unlike a thesis arguing for the establishment of theocracy in America; a wonderful ideal whose only connection to reality is the mockery it will garner by being repeated almost anywhere outside these walls.

In light of this clear confusion, I would suggest a small warning be affixed to each diploma that reads, "By the way, a thing called the 20th century also happened. Unless you plan on hiding in the bowels of a church or in one of the few conservative campuses in this nation, you may want to read up on it, so that you understand why all your new peers are laughing at your genius."

There is your "wake-up call" Mr. Heitmann. Class dismissed.

Editorial
 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2003, The Hillsdale Collegian

The Collegian
33 East College St.
Hillsdale, MI 49242

Website designed and maintained by Daniel Greene