The Hillsdale Collegian
  Volume 127, Number 7                            October 30, 2003
Sections


Home
Features
News
Opinions
Arts
Lifestyles
Sports

 

Archives
View Archive
Advertisers

Rate Card

Ad Contract

Contact Advertising Manager

Editors

Daniel Silliman
Editor-In-Chief

Colleen McGinness
News Editor

John Davidson
Opinions Editor

Joy Ulrickson
Sports Editor

Elliot Wild
Arts Editor

Susannah Luthi
Asst. News Editor

Daniel Greene
Web Editor

Opinions

PETA proves its absurdity-again

Cheryl Heitzman

     Following the tragic turn of events during Siegfried and Roy's Oct. 3 show, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) showed just how uncouth they are once again.
     A tiger that was a part of their act mauled Roy Horn, one half of the famous duo. Horn sustained horrific injuries and was in critical care when PETA faxed a letter to his bedside.
     PETA vice president Dan Mathews chastised Horn for taking the animals from their natural habitat. He urged them to retire the tigers and build a sanctuary for them.
     He has a valid point. Taking wild animals out of their habitat is dangerous, and unnatural for the animals. But PETA should have waited to share their opinions with Horn. Only a get-well wish would have been appropriate at that time.
     PETA is an organization with a long history of radical protesting that routinely gets them into trouble. There is absolutely nothing wrong with animal lovers banding together, but PETA members just don't know how to stay under control.
     Fashion designers that incorporate fur in their designs have had their shows interrupted time after time by protesters with signs claiming "Fur is Dead" and "Fur Kills." Security guards lying in wait have followed the protesters to the stage and wrapped them in fur coats as they drug them off the stage.
     There are countless accounts of PETA members tossing red paint on people wearing fur coats, even one account of a young boy being splashed with blood as he exited a Burger King.
     PETA has a right to believe what they want to, but they cross the line from civil disobedience into tactless and even illegal action too often to be taken seriously.
     Plus, their ideas are just plain dumb.
     Humans developed the technology to become the dominant species on earth and we should not have to apologize for that. Should we go out and randomly kill and torture animals? No, but humans are naturally omnivores; we get nutrition from plant and animal sources.
     To think that species without the capability to think and comprehend are our equals is ludicrous.      Yes, they do feel pain, and when we have to kill them to produce food, it should be as humane as possible; they are creatures of God as well.
     But let's be honest, if it comes down to risking the lives of United States servicemen to clear mines from the Persian Gulf or risking the lives of some dolphins, I say send in the dolphins.
     PETA has many Web sites dedicated to the evils of the food industry, but finding an opinion from a true expert on one of these Web sites is difficult. Finding celebrities who support PETA is not. Intellectual titans such as Alec Baldwin, Alicia Silverstone, Bjork and many others are plastered all over their Web sites, begging us to go vegetarian. The ad verecundiam fallacy comes to mind when these "experts" speak.
     Radical claims of rampant animal torture are also easy to find on Web sites such as http://www.meatstinks.com. It is hard to believe that if these horrible evils were so prevalent the FDA would not do something about them.
     An extreme example of typical PETA conspiracy theory is the Web site http://www.milksucks.com.      This site blames milk for breast cancer, prostate cancer, osteoporosis and almost every childhood affliction imaginable. But valid scientific evidence proving that milk or animal fat leads to cancer or any of these illnesses is nowhere to be found. That's because it isn't true.
     Until a controlled experiment involving a petri dish filled with actual human cells that become cancerous upon exposure to animal fat, the correlationary "evidence" PETA presents should be read with scrutiny, and then laughed at.
     PETA also condemns all animal research. What they don't say is whether or not they personally use any medicines. All medicines that are FDA-approved have been tested on animals at some point in development. Yet I could find no articles describing the refusal of a PETA activist to undergo medical treatment because a certain drug had been tested on animals.
     Hypocrisy, radicalism and tactlessness punctuate the existence of this ridiculous organization. Until they clean up their act and quit pretending that humans and animals are equal, PETA will never be taken seriously by mainstream America.
     Maybe it's just as well.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2003, The Hillsdale Collegian

The Collegian
33 East College St.
Hillsdale, MI 49242
Attn: Daniel Silliman, Editor-in-Chief

Website designed and maintained by Daniel Greene