The Hillsdale Collegian
  Volume 127, Number 7                            October 30, 2003
Sections


Home
Features
News
Opinions
Arts
Lifestyles
Sports

 

Archives
View Archive
Advertisers

Rate Card

Ad Contract

Contact Advertising Manager

Editors

Daniel Silliman
Editor-In-Chief

Colleen McGinness
News Editor

John Davidson
Opinions Editor

Joy Ulrickson
Sports Editor

Elliot Wild
Arts Editor

Susannah Luthi
Asst. News Editor

Daniel Greene
Web Editor

Arts

'Massacre' truly awful

Mindless, depraved violence is shameful

the Collegian @ the Movies


     Farnham: Texas Chainsaw Massacre is the worst movie ever. Do not go see it. To do so would be a terrible waste your time, money and soul.
     Langsather: If you are a puerile waste of flesh and wish to be distracted from distractions by distractions, I suggest you see the aforementioned "film."
     Farnham: I'd tell you who the top-billed actors were, but they didn't act. I'd tell you what the characters names were, but there were no characters. We merely have Evil, incarnate in the bodies of Leatherface and the rest of the Hewitt family, and Victims. All the film presents us with is five generic young adults on their way to a Skynard concert, and the people that decide to murder them without reason. The only thing motivating the viewer to care whether these kids live or die is the fact that they're human. We know nothing of them as individuals.
     On the same token, we know nothing of Leatherface, either. Nothing with the exception that when he was a boy, kids picked on him for a skin disease, told to us by his mother in a violent stream of vocal exposition. Oh! Picked on! Why didn't I think of that? Now maybe I'll go slaughter 33 people because people thought I was an ugly kid! Needless to say, plot and back-story are thin to nonexistent.
     Langsather: I agree. You mention that we only care about the victims because they are human, and such is the case exactly. And yet the movie is itself little more than a dehumanizing agent, reducing the moving art form of cinema to a diabolic parade of cruelty uniquely enabled to disturb the mind.
     Farnham: Some might say, "But it's not supposed to be good, it's a horror movie." And some would be right. But Massacre doesn't even pass muster for a horror movie. Sure, it makes you jump, because you're not quite sure when he's going to jump out with a chain saw, but still you know it's coming. This movie is chock-full of "Let's run through a forest and then hide in a meat-packing plant because we're in a thriller" moments. Hardly scary or spooky. Not that the producers don't try to make some things truly frightening rather than merely surprising. Leatherface gets his name from one of his many fetishes: removing the skin from victims' faces and wearing it as a mask. He rubs salt in wounds, keeps victims alive for inordinate amounts of time, hangs them from meat hooks, and takes part in countless other twisted fantasies. Such things are disturbing along the order of Se7en from a few years back, but this film lacks any of the emotional or spiritual depth required for it to have any kind of effect on the audience. Leatherface's perversions are shown merely for the sake of being disturbing, not to make a point, and thus lose any fear value they might otherwise have had.
     Langsather: There is little for me to add, so I will emphasis your point concerning the lack of emotional and spiritual depth. Take, for an example, Silence of the Lambs. Though a very disturbing movie, it redeems itself by its fascinating plot and misleading action. The real story of the Texas massacre is itself fascinating, and such a tragedy deserves to be told well, but this movie fails even to make the story bearable. There is nothing fascinating to be found in the drama, dialogue or suspense; and there is nothing fascinating to be found in the screams of the dying. Nothing, save the capacity for depravity in the human imagination. I hated every minute of this movie.
     Farnham: It's a shame, pity and sad commentary on modern America not only that this movie was released, but that it opened at No. 1 in the box office. Please, do yourself and all of us a favor and don't watch this film. Zero stars. If I could take stars away, I probably would.
     Langsather: I'm sad that I saw this movie, but if I stop anyone from making the same mistake, it might have been worth sitting through this nauseous enormity. Believe me, this movie is not a well-told tale of horror. It will thoroughly disgust you; or, for those of you "unaffected" by evil, at least it will offend the vestige of humanity in your forgotten soul.
As a matter of formality I grant zero out of a possible five Newcastles to this pathetic waste of time.

 

 

 

Will Farnham
Will Farnham:

Zero Stars

 


Brett Langsather:

Zero Newcastles

 

 

Worst movie ever
Photo courtesy of New Line Cinema

"Leatherface" terrorizes five innocent young adults in the deranged remake of the infamous cult horror flick.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2003, The Hillsdale Collegian

The Collegian
33 East College St.
Hillsdale, MI 49242
Attn: Daniel Silliman, Editor-in-Chief

Website designed and maintained by Daniel Greene