By Peter Krupa
Senior Collegian Reporter
Once in 1972, Oxford don and author J.R.R. Tolkien explained in an
interview how he discovered hobbits: I was doing the dull work
of correcting exam papers when I came upon a blank page someone had
turned ina boon to all exam markers. I turned it over and wrote
on the back, In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit.
Id never heard or used the word before.
Quite simply, this is the way Tolkien approached his myth. He believed
the mythical world with all its complexities was complete, created by
God in Tolkiens mythic imagination. Wizards and Ringwraiths would
wander into his Middle-earth and Tolkiensurprised as anyone else
at these appearanceswas left to explain.
It is in somewhat the same way that Hillsdale history professor Bradley
Birzer approaches Tolkien in his new book J.R.R. Tolkiens Sanctifying
Myth: Understanding Middle-earth. Rather than act as a literary critic
who creates his own ideas about Tolkien, Birzer simply chronicles the
history and thought behind the creation. He depends heavily on primary
sources as he deals with Tolkiens portrayals of myth, heroism,
the created order, the nature of evil, and modernity, making for a fascinating
and reliable narrative.
Though rather short, the book is dense with poignant insight essential
for a deeper understanding and appreciation of Tolkien. The first chapter
lays the biographical groundwork for the rest of the book, relating
Tolkiens life at Oxford and introducing some of the characters
that became major influences in his writing. The chapter is filled with
interesting anecdotes and quotes that biography aficionados will surely
love. For instance, we learn that the land of Mordor in The Lord of
the Rings grew out of Tolkiens experience with trench warfare
in World War I.
Then in the following chapters, Birzer delves into the vast topic of
Tolkiens myth. In the tradition of Blake, T.S. Eliot, and James
Joyce, Tolkien wanted to re-mythologize the Western world. He disliked
the modern era and embraced the imagination as a redemptive thing that
ultimately points to the Christian God.
Throughout the book, Birzer emphasizes that Tolkiens Catholicism
more thoroughly influenced his myth than anything else.
Tolkien was careful to make his own mythology as Christian as
possible, writes Birzer. He specifically wanted to affirm
his own devoutly Catholic worldview, especially its emphasis on the
salvific efficacy of free will in response to Gods grace.
From the mystical lembas of the elves to the various hero figures to
the manifestation of grace, the Catholic faith was Tolkiens inspiration.
The very concept of a sanctifying myth is Catholic in itself.
Despite this close relationship with Catholicism, Birzer flatly denies
Middle-earth an explicit allegorical interpretation.
Tolkien adamantly rejected the notion that his mythology served
as an allegory, he writes.
Though Tolkien admitted some limited allegorical relationships (like
the semblance of the heroic figures to church officials), he denied
he did this intentionally.
Other particularly interesting chapters present Tolkiens views
on the nature of evil and modernity. Birzer goes a long way toward explaining
why Tolkien made the choices he did as far as his evil characters and
their methods of mischief.
Its difficult to find a central focus in Birzers book. As
an obvious fan of Tolkien, Birzer addresses the topic so broadly and
enthusiastically that he sometimes loses sight of his point.
Coupled with that, if there is one flaw in the book it is Birzers
tendency to approach Tolkiens writing from the angle of historical
narrative. This method limits the depth of his examination while often
times broadening his chapters with tangents of interesting but irrelevant
Tolkien trivia. For example, Birzer spends several pages in the middle
of his chapter on Middle-earths created order discussing C.S.
Lewiss anti-Catholicism.
Despite this shortcoming, J.R.R. Tolkiens Sanctifying Myth is
good for what it is: an explanation of Tolkiens myth as he himself
saw it. Perhaps the book is only a forerunner of Birzers deeper,
critical thoughts on Tolkien and perhaps there is more to come.